Science

Out of context: Reply #424

• Started
• Last post
• 1,010 Responses

• Morning_star-1

  ^ I absolutely agree.

  It always troubles me that the atheist/materialist view is that science is a valid and logical replacement for religion. It isn't. Most of us understand the issues/constrictions with the faith required for religion but there are similar issues on the very edges of scientific discovery.

  Morning_star -1Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • the only people who think science is a "replacement" for religion are the religious people, btwmonospaced
  • Fact is, scientific discoveries are so discredting to biblical/religious tenants that it is often seen as the exact oppositemonospaced
  • when in fact, it isn't... science just reveals the measurable truth about reality, while religion barely speculatesmonospaced
  • "Valid", "logical", "religion".
    That's a mess right there.MrT

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread