Israel bombing shit..
Out of context: Reply #857
- Started
- Last post
- 1,208 Responses
- imagineallthepeople0
.
"There has been a continual programme of expansion and illegal settlements"
- lowimpaktnot in gaza. the complete opposite in gaza. israel withdrew from gaza, and dismantled the settlements in gaza.
---
"Leaving gaza wasn't a concession as it was a military occupation in the first instance..."
- lowimpaktend of occupation of gaza, one of the things the pals demanded. israel gave them one of the things they wanted. pulled out, dismantled settlements. how is that not a concession?
except if your argument is that it's not a concession if israel doesn't concede fully to all demands. all or nothing, right.
the radicals saw it the same way btw, they thought of the withdrawal as military victory, not as a concession. not as a proof of good will.
this is exactly why israel can't make any concessions now.
---
"the withdrawal was followed by an illegal blockade and siege"
- lowimpaktyes, a whole three years after israel left, israel closed the borders because they were continuously attacked, harder than before the withdrawal. they had to block the inflow of weapons somehow.
if you don't recognize the rationality of that decision, maybe think about how much more children would die now, if hamas were armed better.
---
> you don't make sense. all you do is blame israel.