Science
Science
Out of context: Reply #234
- Started
- Last post
- 1,010 Responses
- detritus0
“It shouldn't really require poring over statistics to prove this stuff... ”
It sort of should, though. Even if it's just a somewhat verifiable instance of One (not Son). That'd be a start.
Where's there evidence — any at all — of any any of this pseudo meta science in exhibition? Nowhere. Hence Randi's slightly farcical million dollar prize. It's not intended as Science, it's just intended to try and tempt some sort of evidence out of the woodwork.
At least Science knows that Dark Matter, et al, are hapless cludges, really in need of cleaning up. Hence, more Science.
That's kind of its point.
- It's only the scientific ignoratti who assume Science knows everything, that Science is comfortable with Dark Energiesdetritus
- Scientists (big S, seeing as we're there already) think the exact opposite.detritus
- Evidence galore: http://www.deanradin…Morning_star
- Shouldn't require statistics, because if what they were claiming was true, it should be easy to demonstrateukit2