Science
Out of context: Reply #228
- Started
- Last post
- 1,010 Responses
- ukit20
"Astrophysicists hypothesized dark matter because of discrepancies between the mass of large astronomical objects determined from their gravitational effects and the mass calculated from the "luminous matter" they contain: stars, gas, and dust....According to consensus among cosmologists, dark matter is composed primarily of a not yet characterized type of subatomic particle."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar…
A new kind of particle is a reasonable extrapolation from what we already know about the universe. The idea that people can communicate telepathically and affect objects far away from them with their minds isn't. It's a completely random non-sequitur that only someone who already wanted to believe in supernatural explanations would suggest.
- It could be their math is wrong or how they come up with numbers. Dark matter came out of being out of an accounting error.yurimon
- However one can ask can you come up with mass equation by smashing a whole into pieces?yurimon
- Alot of these equations are patching up to make old equations work.. keeping people employed n paid in universities.yurimon
- imagine being a tenure prof and you were wrong all your life...yurimon
- Like I said earlier, IF you had no experience or havent witnessed psychic phenomena then it foreign and inconceivableyurimon
- Sure, but there's also competition and a lot of incentive to prove new ideasukit2
- even if their is an explanation in science. it is often dismissed even though its an opportunity to explore.yurimon
- but science is missing. Look at the nazis. They merged spirit n science. their science was way more advance then americans.yurimon