Science
Science
Out of context: Reply #227
- Started
- Last post
- 1,010 Responses
- Morning_star0
i forgot this bit
"When scientists refer to "dark matter" they are talking about the fact that objects in space"
The 'fact' of it is there is no object. There is no test, measurement or analysis on earth that can detect DM. Using the existing Standard Model DM does not exist. The only thing we can measure is the gravitational effect it has on surround matter. I've explained this before with a link supported by Lawrence Krauss saying exactly the same thing as i'm asserting. 4:41 to 6:18 in the linked video.
---------------- 'Dark matter' basically means 'we have literally fuck all idea what we're talking about and are making things up to fit our beliefs'set
- "they are talking about the fact that objects in space have a greater gravitational effect"ukit2
- No they're not. There is no object and that's the problem.Morning_star
- Read the quote I posted below...what I'm talking about are the gravitational effects of other objects in space which lead scientists to think there is a missing component not being measured.ukit2
- lead scientists to think there is a missing component not being measured.ukit2
- You're quite right. I thought you were claiming that DM was the object.Morning_star
- it might not be an object, but signs point to it having incredible mass which would cause gravitational pullmonospaced
- Indeed. Speculation as to the size of the particle are unprecedented. It does however call in to question the supersymmetry theory.Morning_star
- theory regarding supersymmetry.Morning_star