Science

Out of context: Reply #207

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,010 Responses
  • Morning_star0

    ^ Your constant assertion that science and religion are different sides of the same coin is fundamentally wrong. They are NOT interchangeable or comparable. For Instance, to claim that, 'Religion is the reason for violence and oppression' can be replaced by 'Science is the solution for violence and oppression' is illogical and lacking critical thinking. Science by definition can be proved wrong because results are testable and the passage of time allows for review, progression and discovery. The answer to religions failings is not science.

    • JESUS
      FUCKING
      CHRIST
      RELAX
      utopian
    • I am and this was in reply to Monos post.Morning_star
    • Roots of science come from religion. Astrology = cosmology, alchemy=chemistry, vedic texts= quantum physicsyurimon
    • The roots of all of religions failings will be in science, because religions are archaic and science IS progressmonospaced
    • ANYWAY, the reason they're not comparable is because religion is a BELIEF system and science is not. Thank you.monospaced
    • you actually proved my point for me and the entire threadmonospaced
    • If it makes you feel better believing I've proved your point then so be it. However, in reality I have done no such thing.Morning_star
    • The reason they are not comparable is nothing to do with belief. Belief is an inherent part of both religion and science but as you won't engage in discussion about this then you'll never know why you're so wrong.Morning_star
    • as you won't engage in discussion about this then you'll never know why you're so wrong.Morning_star

View thread