Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #18906
- Started
- Last post
- 33,467 Responses
- IRNlun60
^ That article, and what seems to be most of the ranchers supporters, completely gloss over the legal ownership of the land as if it's just a minor and irrelevant fact. Then preach about stomping on the constitution, overreaching government, aggressive law enforcement and federal rights. Even the rancher knows it's not his land. Are they basically declaring that laws are not relevant and are defending it with a militia? What are the militia protecting? The cows, or the land that's not theirs?
- That's because they're old rich white dudes. You see, government is supposed to work for them...TheBlueOne
- only brown people have to worry about "laws"TheBlueOne
- These guys sucking off the government tit as much as a "welfare queen"..TheBlueOne
- Gov't needs just one A10 to wipe these retards out..TheBlueOne
- ..but let them wave their winchesters in the air like they accomplished something..TheBlueOne
- ..the iRS will be all up in their bidness next year.TheBlueOne
- http://scontent-b-lg…IRNlun6
- Its a state rights issue to them prob because he comes from an old family.yurimon
- Its a question of role of Gov. I would look back to how it was when his family started ranching. I think they going by that traditionyurimon
- I think we all should be owned by the gov that we dont have to worry and we would live in a utopiayurimon
- plus people say what gov is not other way around. but i see the conflict as you go federal. more bureaucratic and cold.yurimon
- plus he said he was happy to pay if their policies didnt put him out business..yurimon
- Or he could, you know, NOT use land that's NOT his any morelocustsloth
- Like I said. its state rights issue and rights of late 1800'syurimon
- Tell the gov to give back the land to the indians if you thats the logic..yurimon
- actually, that's what the government should do by YOUR logic, yurihereswhatidid