Ask Your SEO Q's 2014

Out of context: Reply #5

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 44 Responses
  • prophetone0

    Tactics? yeah I got ur final fantasy tactics. Enough already with the splitting of content across many pages, which in almost all cases is not done for the sake of good ux or storytelling. It could be tho, if done right.

    Alas nigh, it's done this way tx to the head seo "guru" at a company, often self-appointed because 'they're good at the internet' blindly decides that page views and ad loads are more important than ux. See this thread: http://www.qbn.com/topics/684225…

    And then that's it. they don't think it through, they don't get concerned about those awkward page transitions in the editorial itself; no custom copy for the online implementation. or even no transitions or logic at all, hey why not! just cut it like a cake and spread it and for-ged it! Get those numbers!

    Because honestly, it's misunderstood smoke and magic to even those who practice that sort if evil seo sorcery. Hide ur children. the end.

    • +1000000000 this is almost always the case for those sites you don-t visit regularly but only linked to.monNom
    • And you don't visit regularly, because their ux is so incredibly shit for the sake of a couple extra clicks.monNom

View thread