Logo crit. review - arq. studio
Logo crit. review - arq. studio
Out of context: Reply #3
- Started
- Last post
- 18 Responses
- CygnusZero40
When I think about modernistic architecture logos, I feel like they should either be really, really simple with just text, or have some solid weight to a symbol if you need to have one, to reflect the strength of the work that went into the buildings, strong foundation, etc...
Your logo feels a little too creative to me, and looks too weak when place on top of a nice photo due to it just being lines. Plus the angled lines dont represent anything to me. I feel like with logos its such a simple thing that every aspect of it should have a meaning. He probably doesnt build many buildings with crazy angled lines, right?