Logo crit. review - arq. studio

Out of context: Reply #2

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 18 Responses
  • CygnusZero40

    Its not bad, but I guess it feel more like an origami logo. It looks a bit out of place on the image of the building because the building is all straight vertical and horizontal lines.

    Maybe youre trying to get too creative with this, when it seems like just a good really simple, solid logo will work. Maybe even just text play, no symbol, or if you do a symbol, maybe a solid white square with a simple shape knocked out of the center of it? That seems like it might fit better on top of that building image, would feel more solid to me.

    • Hey, Cygn, I started dsigning it thinking of uising just types, sort of swiss, grid style, but the studio really wants a symbol to mark the identity. I think it is ok to have a symbol, it makes it les boring you know, And more recognizable.marianaspag
    • the identity,. I belive it i a good thing, to mae it more recognizable and less boring.marianaspag

View thread