Syria
Out of context: Reply #106
- Started
- Last post
- 253 Responses
- autoflavour0
inv, i would argue that its less of NO WAR, but more of who it is we are actually fighting, and having proof of why.
There is yet to be concrete evidence of who actually used chemical weapons. When you have options ranging from Syrian Government, Rebels, Al Qaida, Rebels armed with CW from Saudi's or the worst of all, a false flag operation instigated by any number of external powers who have their own vested interests in taking out the Syrian government.. I cant say that rushing into any kind of armed conflict is advisable, let alone legal.
In the worst case scenario, the US/Israel are complicit in the use of Chemical weapons in Syria, and these are the same people trumpeting the loudest for a military intervention.
I am not saying this is the case, what i am saying is that until there is some hard evidence which is agreed on by the international community, any country willing to "go it alone" is totally suspect in motive.