Syria

Out of context: Reply #63

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 253 Responses
  • GeorgesIV0

    Attacking Syria is about saving face, not saving lives
    There is no such thing as a "surgical strike", and we must assume that civilians may be killed in any airstrikes.

    "Why should military action be necessitated by outrage over chemical attacks? Was there a red line on chemical weapons when the US used depleted-uranium ammunition in Fallujah, Iraq? Was there a red line when Israel deployed white phosphorous in Gaza in 2008? Or when Saddam Hussein, then a western ally, gassed the Iranians and then his own people during the 1980s? This arbitrary and self-serving declaration of what's acceptable is precisely what makes the US so lacking in credibility when it comes to preaching codes of warfare to the Middle East. "

    http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth…

View thread