Lightroom 4 vs Aperture 3
Lightroom 4 vs Aperture 3
Out of context: Reply #15
- Started
- Last post
- 19 Responses
- vaxorcist0
Lightroom is quite nice for the brushes and low-light noise.... Capture one seems to have the best skin tone i've ever seen in a RAW converter, but not so great with bad light high ISO work... capture one was originally made for the capture one medium format backs, but works nicely on Nikon/Canon files.... it is a smaller company and it is a bit more tempermental than adobe lightroom....
Hasselblad's Phocus is pretty nice and last I checked was free and on the mac at least, it could read RAW files from many other camera manufacturers, as I believe it used apple's raw converter ... not as many brushes, but nice skin tone... and yes, it's used on hassle camera shoots... or at least was when I was a digital assistant...