WarOnXMas
WarOnXMas
Out of context: Reply #46
- Started
- Last post
- 137 Responses
- yurimon0
^ i like your religious fervor in defense of atheism. Yes and your argument would correct if there were no people and just animals and no semantic way to express any concepts. but your argument is a what if there were no people scenario which is not true to the reality.
The way you're taught and propagandized on the concept of God and religion is much different from the origins or the relationship between man and his ancient perception.
it a hard comparison to make. However its from religion you have science. ironic..- If there were no people, are you saying there would also be no God?monospaced
- and please, don't think that only religious people can be fervorous, that's just not fairmonospaced
- No just the concept of atheism. we are talking semantics hereyurimon
- yes, but your point is that atheism requires religion. if nobody was taught religion, it wouldn't existmonospaced