Ron Paul 2012
Ron Paul 2012
Out of context: Reply #67
- Started
- Last post
- 78 Responses
- waterhouse0
^
Gold standard is your only beef? Then you and I have little common ground on social rights.He is principled. And that's neat. But - as you've candidly indicated - his political agenda covers darker ground than you may realize.
- define social rights. not sure your interpretationdeathboy
- and his agenda on darker ground im not sure about either. My concerns is wether an objective standard is feasible at this point for monetary policy. I need to read his books see if he goes into detail backing itdeathboy
- feasible. I need to read his books to understand his reasoning and why he thinks it would work.deathboy
- Define? Sure.
He's proudly opposed to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.waterhouse - From what I see, his man-crush on the Constitution is "smoke and mirrors."waterhouse
- Is that because it restricted rights of some and gave more to others?deathboy
- What was her directly opposed to and the reasoning? A lot of the civil rights act was garbagedeathboy
- albeit it might have helped change the social conditioning of the time, but still not rightdeathboy
- He's attempted to retract much of his past hate speech.waterhouse
- I dont know much about the hate speech. But the ability to discriminate in trade is a right. If the hate comes from the idea of discrimination its weakdeathboy
- of discrimination and its negative conditioning than it is weak.deathboy
- Discrimination at the time was terrible because of social conditioning. Civil rights act i tempoted to agree was a necessary evil to awaken peopledeathboy
- necessary evil, but because it did some good doesnt change the fact it wasnt rightdeathboy
- As a generic whole some parts im sure were legit. Thats the problem with packaged dealsdeathboy