USDA v. Lance Armstrong
USDA v. Lance Armstrong
Out of context: Reply #77
- Started
- Last post
- 195 Responses
- Gucci0
Bollocks. It's practially been proven that everyone else doped in the Tour races which Lance allegedly doped in. In other words: he still won on a level playing field.
Get it over with and start a doping league. It'll end up being like car racing where technology is king. You either have the talent and the goods to win or you get out of the sandbox.
- Bollocks! It wasn't a level playing field. Lance Armstrong was the highest paid cyclist in the peloton and therefore had better doctors and techniques. Read Tyler's book - it most certainly wasn't a "level playing field."
ronburgundy - access to better doctors and techniques. Read Tyler Hamilton's book and you will quickly find it was in no way a level playing field.ronburgundy
- a level playing field.ronburgundy
- All the more reason to have it all out in the open. At least it can be about who's got the best "funding" and not "cheating".Gucci
- "cheating".Gucci
- Bollocks! It wasn't a level playing field. Lance Armstrong was the highest paid cyclist in the peloton and therefore had better doctors and techniques. Read Tyler's book - it most certainly wasn't a "level playing field."