time traveling

Out of context: Reply #7

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 12 Responses
  • Horp0

    I hate to be the one to break it to you, but it didn't work. You couldn't post the second comment, without reading the first one first. Had you have read the first one first, you would not say "Lets see if this time travelling shit works" you would have said "it works!", except that in order to reply in that way, the first post would have had to have introduced the idea of testing time travel, and it doesn't, it just says "It worked!", which provides no context for the 'past' you to work with.

    So the first post would have had to read "lets see if this time traveling shit works" and your reply would have to read "It worked!".

    And if they appeared in that order, then there would be no proof that time travel worked.

    - Sent from my Olivetti in 1964

    • I dunno what the fuck you are talking about. I was just trying to make a funny tread Einstein.sureshot
    • ;)sureshot
    • And according to the timestamp you only went back in time one minute.ORAZAL
    • Only ONE minute? Dude I stepped into a whole new realmsureshot

View thread