USDA v. Lance Armstrong

Out of context: Reply #38

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 195 Responses
  • _niko0

    hard to believe they tested him 100's of times and not got a positive result.

    Then again, it's claimed that they paid doctors to hide the positive tests.

    _niko 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Doctors? You mean lab technicians. Anyway, they do not know who's test belong to which riders. At that stage, they are onlyPresta
    • (the samples) are only identifiable by a number.Presta
    • The number and positive samples are given to the race organizers. And then organizers connect the number to the rider's name.Presta
    • name of the rider.Presta
    • The claim is whether Lance paid the organizers (Tour officials or UCI) to hide positive result(s).Presta
    • My belief is that the French organizers would have loved to catch Lance as a cheat. But they never did.Presta
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread