USDA v. Lance Armstrong
USDA v. Lance Armstrong
Out of context: Reply #31
- Started
- Last post
- 195 Responses
- ChrisKeegan0
They say they have evidence of two positive tests and TEN people willing to testify against him...Wow.
- then show the fucking evidence. put it on the news. do something.mg33
- MG, I'm sorry. They have a case and Armstrong knows what they have.waterhouse
- It was Lances decision to not face the evidence in a court of law, not the USADA's.UKV
- "retested samples" that means they slipped something in the second time.lambsy