wikileaks

Out of context: Reply #577

• Started
• Last post
• 646 Responses

• Dodecahedron0

  "Wikileaks themselves has repeatedly referred to it as a single source."

  I still havn't seen that though, I'd like to so I can be sure.

  For that second part this is a big part of the senario. I simply figured it was compiled, all being from US embassy's, so they were released together. My big question is how do you prove it was one source? Why on earth would wikileaks state anything in the singular or plural considering the source? It really doesn't prove anything, it is giving too much away and is highly suspicious in and of itself.

  Dodecahedron 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • I just gave you two examples of them referring to it that way dude... I give up :)abettertomorrow
  • no they NEVER explicitly say one source sryDodecahedron
  • Like... "We got the cables from ONE individual source"Dodecahedron

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread