Cost of error
Out of context: Reply #20
- Started
- Last post
- 27 Responses
- mg330
I didn't do this, but at my previous job, a law firm, we were working with an outside designer on some magazine ads. He did great work, and we were doing this series of ads that juxtaposed something large with something small, "just the right fit" or some bullshit that's so tired it's nearly dead.
Anyhow, he used this picture of a Mastif dog or some kind of huge dog, and after it was approved and published, nobody but me noticed how distasteful it was that he used a photo of a male dog sitting down, with a huge huge huge dick and balls 100% visible in the picture. My boss was a woman, and when I showed it to her she flipped out and was like "how did we not notice this?" It wasn't an earth-shattering mistake, it was just so wrong and nasty. Look around at ads with dogs, you hardly ever find a male dog with it's junk exposed, the poor things.
- lol just the right fit indeed.mcmillions
- I think it had a tiny poodle next to it actually, making it so much more crude.mg33
- bahahahmcmillions
- :D :D :DBargels