digital vs film
Out of context: Reply #44
- Started
- Last post
- 65 Responses
- Meeklo0
"Yes, but the thread is about two mediums, not whether content is more important than equipment. Nice sentiments, just the wrong thread"
Tc was just getting back to the origins of the thread, other people before him had changed the direction towards the "if you shoot digital you are not a photographer"
Tc: I agree with you completly.
By giving the chance to new mediums to improve your work and experiments new things (lets face it, there are a lot of stuff that you can do with digital that you couldnt do with film) proves you are open minded, and that is the only way of pushing the envelope.Like I said before, denial of new techological tools that helps express our art, can be a tricky thing if you are just closing the doors, cause of a personal attachment.
"When the TB303 was created, people wouldnt like them because they thought they where trying to emulate traditional musical instruments. A few years later their prices started to go up again, when people relised the possibilities of those synths to create new sounds, sounds that nobody ever imagine they would exist" Robert Moog