A tool to deceive and slaughter

Out of context: Reply #11

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 37 Responses
  • jolly_rotten0

    The title doesn't make any sense and neither does the sculpture. Its not a tool, it doesn't deceive since the teleological rationale is a transaction and a contract, and finally there is no slaughter. The artist apes the Hirst's practice. This work also reliant upon the network and grid for its existence which handicaps its pretensions to objecthood. A far more rigorous and less legal approach to transactions is Danica Phelps. She at least puts her skin in the game.

View thread