Jesus everywhere
Out of context: Reply #93
- Started
- Last post
- 113 Responses
- kelpie0
@designbot : ok, one post and then I'm out. I've been in hundreds of these over the years and I try not to get into it any more.
Science never ever talks about absolute fact, there is no concept of absolute fact in science. That is built into the process. You guys do though, that is a the point of faith. You have no empirical evidence for your position yet you promote it as absolute fact. Well, whatever, I don;t really give a monkeys. You are wrong. I say wrong, because this is the position you take, because you are not engaging with and accepting the body of scientific progress yet also keeping an open mind as regards the remaining black spots in the pattern on show. Your faith means you take this position of absolute fact.
You extrapolate the existence of an almighty creator from the gaps, most people post-enlightenment (and I'm sorry if those terms hurt your feelings, but that is the situation here) would extrapolate the likelihood of at some point discovering a physical explanation from the rest of the body of knowledge, and from the really quite stunning progress we have made in science since the church let go of its grip on education and knowledge.
Its this extrapolation I find insane. You see gaps and claim validation for something which is based in mythology and magic, which has never been and will (most likely) never be observed or tested or quantified.
And you expect us to do the running here? nonsense
because I'm actually a nice guy I will apologise for calling you an imbecile though, that was unfair.
ok, that's me out. Much love gramme, I wish these threads wouldn't keep coming up.