Mumbai Terrorist Attacks

Out of context: Reply #17

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 109 Responses
  • pr20

    depending on which side of barricade you are for ones they are terrorist for others they are freedom fighters

    • Elaborate. Which freedom in India do you speak of Plato?babaganush
    • wrongbrandelec
    • Yeah spraying innocent tourists with bullets is a sane way of getting your point across.DrBombay
    • hahahamorilla
    • there´s no justification for this. none.gung_hoek
    • i'm not defending those dudes but i became so sick of everyone labeling everybody terroristspr2
    • If they target civilians they are terrorists. Simplebabaganush
    • yeah but by that definition every country in the world engaged in terrorist activity at some pointpr2
    • that´s some deep thoughts you got there, pr2.gung_hoek
    • As a by product maybe. Not as a sole aim of conflict. It's terrorism.babaganush
    • i'm pretty sure it goes deeper then "Let's go kill some tourists!"pr2
    • Jesus man. Yeah, you can be right on and deconstruct it like some thesis. If it was your father that got shot on a business trip - you'd se it as terrorismbabaganush
    • business trip, you'd call it terrorismbabaganush
    • And I didn't think for a second it was a hoot to kill some touristsbabaganush
    • of course man, but because it wasn't my father then i can step back and think it through calmlypr2
    • Sorry but you sound a bit pompous. I'm still being rational - so elaborate then. How is it freedom fighting? Even by pure dictionary definition?babaganush
    • dictionary definition?babaganush
    • this was to said that the terrorist calling is the simplest mind game. I don't agree with their tactics but whether i agree with their aims...pr2
    • their aims -- i don't know because i don't know the issues at heart.pr2
    • yeah I understand. But their tactics are precisely what makes them terrorists. None of us are placed to comment on their aims.babaganush
    • aims.babaganush

View thread