New Tomato site

Out of context: Reply #6

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 17 Responses
  • Spookytim0

    Oh come on now. They are shit, they have always been shit. They just plop a bit of something down, off centre, a bit edgy, do a David Carson extreme crop on a bit of abstract imagery, drop a cirlce there and use a dither of type here, and then they keep a straight face and attempt to dissuade any critical questioning by bombarding the questioner with intellectucal theories and silly cultural references.

    I am also convinced now more than ever that the original Tomatoers sold each of their directorships to eager designers wanting to buy in to the big cloud of kudos they pouffed up around themselves. I bet John Warwicker isn't anywhere near that place no more.

    Spookytim 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • You still hate that underworld cover don't you?ian
    • Ooooh Yes. If I had to compile a list of design items that I felt were utter shite, that would be near the top.Spookytim
    • hahaha! Sah, I say sah, I adirme the courage of your convictions! (Said in foghorn leghorn southern drawl...)ian
    • I hate that underworld cover with a passion!!phatlee
    • A hundred days off? Is that the one? I hate that one big time.PSYKHO
    • Nope, I believe that the one that bears the full brunt of Spooky ire is 'beaucoup fish'.ian
    • shame as its a good album to listen tooFallowDeer
    • I don't mind that cover, good album I do agree.. Its just the hundred days off one I hate?PSYKHO
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread