Union of North America
Out of context: Reply #18
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- detritus0
Maybe you're right Transit_Broadcast, but I was trying to be serious, not 'smart'. I'm interested in the idea of the NAU and the future of organisations like NATO, and was intrigued by the topic and gladdened by QBN's response, so thought I'd try to respond in kind. You're right that it's badly written - I've only a rough handle on all the bits'n'pieces I've read over the years and am not very good at succinctly putting my thoughts across - but so what? Why should that rile you enough to attack me personally? I'm clearly not writing for some broadsheet, but trying to engage with people who I share some kind of affinity, who have a different perspective. Hence the 'social design' line - we're supposedly on a design forum, so thought it a glib paraphrasing - hence the ''s.
So, again - why the attack? Have I annoyed you at some point previously? Are you another QBNer under a pseudonym? What?