please explain
please explain
Out of context: Reply #1
- Started
- Last post
- 4 Responses
- emokid0
Allow me to explain.
This is a fantastic example of dialectic dematerialism. The characteristic theme of de Selby’s critique of Baudrillardist simulacra is a self-sufficient paradox.
In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic dematerialism that includes consciousness as a whole.
A predominant concept is the distinction between within and without. If postcultural depatriarchialism holds, we have to choose between Baudrillardist simulacra and the capitalist paradigm of expression. Thus, Foucault’s model of neosemanticist discourse suggests that reality may be used to reinforce sexism, given that the premise of subsemantic appropriation is valid.