Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #519
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- JazX0
flagellum, then again, that's considered a relative dating method, however, that's a massive inconsistency.
here's another you might like:
The Swiss Matterhorn And Mythen Peak Problems
In other cases, evolutionists have the massive Swiss Matterhorn being moved upward and sideways for more than forty miles, in order to explain why it is out of place in the geological time column. But that is only a small thing when compared to the Mythen Peak of the Alps, which has a number of strata which are all out of order. Eocene is on the bottom, then Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous. This is a contradiction of the geological time column’s fanciful dating of these rock formations. In order to try to work their way out of this embarrassing denial of their schemes, historic geologists have arbitrarily moved this mountain, in tact, thousands of miles from Africa into Switzerland!
----
also inexplicable by my limited geologic knowledge