Darwinist
Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #509
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- flagellum0
Tick, if ID is not science then neither is Archaeology, or any other field where one discriminates between Specified Complexity and random natural mechanisms. It's that simple. Shouting "it's not science!" doesn't change the fact that it is. But if you choose to side with political propagandists instead of openly looking at the facts... have it your way. I've asked you in this thread to tell me exactly how the core tenets of ID are religion and not science and you didn't even touch it. We both know why.
Only part of this thread is about Philosophy. ;)