Darwinist

Out of context: Reply #468

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 592 Responses
  • flagellum0

    Homology of components and co-option, does nothing for anti-religionist, P.Z. Myers. He's spouting the same refuted argument as Ken Miller. Efficient engineers always re-use materials for other systems. Doesn't show how a mindless mechanism can build something needs all it's parts at once and has been shown to fail with the removal of one component. If anything homology points even more toward ID.

    Tick, is rehashing old data.

View thread