Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #466
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- balboa0
How many times is it necessary for Flagellator to be epicly latered?
At this point, other than flexing some seriously impressive expository muscles, aren't we just honing his debate skills?
Aren't we simply enabling him to evolve into a more resistant strain of the virus?
Who is benefiting more from this exercise after 4509450945 responses?
One side gets higher blood pressure and does everything it can to shine a larger spotlight on what it considers to be a flawed theory, while the other finds more nuanced ways to pirouette around each attack.
Collectively you have proven that a complex subject can be rotated and displayed infinitely, but still not completely understood.
But isn't part of the ID posse's game to patiently keep the subject in the public sphere so that, through sheer volume of debate (and the scientific community's increased effort to methodically disprove every miniscule detail) it succeeds at positioning itself "in opposition" to the prevailing theory?
Hasn't Flagelicious essentially inferred that his sole purpose is to perpetuate the debate?
If so, then this battle was won/lost at the 100th post.
meh.