Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #442
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- DrHuxtable0
This may have been the link I saw earlier, but I am not positive. Anyway, the papers I looked through did not exactly support ID or attempt to prove evolution. They pretty much stated something along the lines of: this does not fit in with what we believed was the case before. Maybe I don't get it, but I am sure that science progresses in this manner. No?
Your apparent knowledge of ID, and the complexities of science you seem to understand must be consuming. You must spend a lot of your free time researching the subject since your field is graphic design? I'll try and look through some of these again if I can find some time. My lab looks at things on a macro level, and not related to ID at all, really.
Again though, I want to ask: If ID is so obvious, why is there such a fight for legislation to force it to be in school curriculum? Other theorie currently accepted did not seem to have this problem.