Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #436
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- DrHuxtable0
In short, NeoDarwinism is empty philosophy masquerading as science and it contains holes big enough to drive an intelligently designed truck through.
flagellum
(Jan 6 06, 08:39)Its funny how believers in ID act as if they are on to some "new" science. I find it especially cute when Darwin's Theory of Evolution is labeled as "steamboat era" science. I'm sure its been said before about ID, but I will state it again: a pig with lipstick is still a pig. You are just calling creationism something else and claming science is supporting it.
Crafty. Discipler, couple months ago I asked you to point me in the direction of some scientific papers supporting ID, and you tried. I read about 4 or 5 of them, and all I can conclude is that followers of ID are reinterpreting other peoples work. For example, someone publishes work which does not fit the evolution theory perfectly, the result is taken and twisted into meaning that there must have been a designer. Kind of shady if you ask me.
Where are the papers where people are attempting to prove the existence of a designer. Maybe I was not specific enough with my initial request. The links you provide do not show that. They simply steal others work, and claim it means something other than the author's stated meaning.
Scientific theories are just that, theories. No one takes these things as being absolute, and I don't beileve I was ever taught they were. Obviously there are large holes in evolution, but take away a designer and you have nothing to support your theory. Stating something is so complex that there has to be a designer is insulting really and waters science down. Science will not progress if this is going to be the thought process we adopt.
If ID is just so obvious, why is there a need to have to pass legislature to have it taught? The people who came up with the Big-Bang Theory certainly did not have to do this. They went to the lab and did there work ... until believers of ID start doing their own work, and not reinterpreting everyone else's, it is a joke.