Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #381
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- flagellum0
"The ID guys are playing old Socratic Sophist tricks with ;language it seems to me by sayig that "See science is inaccurate here! So therefore it casts ALL of it into doubt!""
----
Not true. ID theorists and scientists are simply following the evidence where it leads. And they are not following evidence about age of the earth issues. That doesn't concern the science of ID. Not sure why that's so difficult for you, Tick.
-----
"I mean it seems to me they don't even grasp the fundamental principles that underly all of scientific enquiry to begin with. Science is all about finding better and better questions. Anything in science that doesn't lead you to another question is bad science. "
------You reeeaaally should actually learn what ID science states. ID is raising the better questions: like, how did digital code find it's way into the cell? and how can darwin's mechanism with all it's limitations produce the change which darwinists say it does? etc...
------
""Unreducably complex""
------
oooohhh, TIck. Please learn about it. lol