Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #318
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- kelpie0
kelpie, I'm all about following the evidence wherever it may lead. and I'm not necessarily an Young Earth Creationist. It's just that the evidence, taken as a whole, leads away from NeoDarwinism.
discipler
(Jan 6 06, 05:28)you chop and change your position on the young earth as it suits your arguements mate. You only follow eveidence where it uits you too, hence why anytime it doesn't you just focus on a few natural inconsistencies in technique and rubbish entire tracts of evidence. See carbon dating, see the 2nd law of thermodynamics etc. See the fact that your arguement is based on gaps in knowledge while the other is based on compilation of knowledge. Your an anti-scientist. I wouldn't contest that at some point so far back we don't have a hope of finding any evidence either way it is indeed a *possibility* that a designer sparked the universe into life, but really, considering that it can never be either prooved or disprooved, what is the point?