Darwinist
Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #298
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- discipler0
Makes for a good bedtime tale, but lacks empirical evidence. This is what they've been telling us for some time now. They begin by presupposing Darwinism and then are forced to explain timeframes and social/technological advancement within that framework. The problem is, if homo sapien possessed the full cognitive potential that he does today, it is rediculous to posit that he existed for over 100,000 years with essentially no progression except for primitive tool construction. Learning to harvest crops simply does not account for the degree of advancement in such a short period of time nor the degree of stasis prior to the boom.
It's a narritive. Calling me "stupid" won't change this. ;)