Public Voice Network
- Belfast & Dublin, Ire… 1919
- Bitcoin 111111
- DaftPunk 195195
- the gif animation thread 1840818408
- Chick of the day .Gif 4949
- Nature of the day 4545
- blog 5768557685
- Quote someone 11461146
- Official NSFW Thread 250250
- Pic of the Day 7463974639
- documentaries 359359
- Unique Insults 5555
- MILF's and curvy chic… 271271
- Amy's Baking Company 9797
- Ann Coulter is retarded 55
- identify artist... 44
- Kanye video projections i… 44
- Photos like this 1313
- Made a memorial page for … 1616
- News of the day... 654654
- Google Glass 138138
- Gay thread 121121
- EC: Anthony Wallace 77
- partnership set up 66
Piracy Paradox II 1818 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 11 months ago | Thread started: May 26, 10, 3:05 p.m.
Out of context: Response #9 [May 26, 10, 3:05 p.m.]
- whatsup
@ pr2 + everyone else
After re-looking at the data statistics, i have to agree that in light of her discussion, the data analysis could be a little misleading. Why? Because she is running a comparison between two industries that both face copyright infringement. Insinuating that enforcing copyright protection leads to less sales.
However, these low income sales from 2007 could have been very well caused by the "digitization/ Internet". Even though these companies that are enforcing copyright protection are also the same companies whose products can be sent over the web. Unlike food, automobiles, furniture and fashion.

- View thread




