Public Voice Network
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Beeeees! 1212
- Minimum rate? 33
- Aging = Scary 88
- FACE EATER 1313
- alternatives to chrome?? 99
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Outfit of the Day 33
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- Vid of the Day 1203412034
- the gif animation thread 1283512835
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Pic of the Day 6330263302
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
- What is THEIR work? 55
- Meme of the day 1414
- Letterpress process video 33
- Video Cameras Under $2000 77
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2323
Ruby-Processing 3939 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 21, 10, 8:16 a.m.
Out of context: Response #11 [Mar 21, 10, 8:16 a.m.]
- stewdio
@drgss. Yes. Typographically clean. Compare Ruby to Java for instance and you'll see that Ruby does a great job getting rid of excessive semicolons, curly braces, parenthesis, etc. There's a real flexibility with how you write Ruby code so instead of just writing code that the computer can understand you can write code that looks clean and better communicates to other humans what your intent is. There's a great quote from the book Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs: "Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute."
I have a deep appreciation for clean coding. When I work with other designers and they hand me code that is concise and legible it draws my instant respect.


- View thread



