Public Voice Network
- Video Cameras Under $2000 77
- FACE EATER
- the gif animation thread 1283112831
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2323
- What is THEIR work? 44
- Pic of the Day 6330063300
- News of the day... 136136
- Chick of the Day 1537915379
- Letterpress process video 22
- New York 44
- Show your latest Pics 32943294
- XBMC 33
- what happened? 2222
- F1 2012 1919
- Vid of the Day 1203312033
- paper trail 88
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
Web FontFonts 88 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 3, 10, 12:03 a.m.
Out of context: Response #8 [Mar 3, 10, 12:03 a.m.]
- Typographica
> FF DIN looks like fucking Arial under 16px
What page are you looking at and in what browser?
> doesn't work in most browsers
That's a strange statement given that Web FontFonts work in IE and Firefox 3.6. And Safari and Chrome via Typekit. What are the "most browsers" you refer to?
> bad (well not mine at least) choices for the features that are left in the fonts
OSF would be nice, yes, but web designers would be far more upset if they didn't have access to the lining figures. That's why OSF are optional in the Small Caps. Believe me, I'd rather see all figure styles remain, but this is a limitation of CSS, not the fonts. Fortunately OT features are in the CSS3 font module and Mozilla plans to support them. Other browsers should too. http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/…
- View thread
