Public Voice Network
- intern -> job 2323
- Russian Fonts (cyrillic) 11
- Multicolored logos? 2222
- What are you listening to… 41764176
- Lost a big account . . . 4040
- Live chat software
- Shit QBNers Say 148148
- what the blog? 44
- Vid of the Day 1096210962
- Pic of the Day 5938659386
- Dude of the day 452452
- the gif animation thread 1132511325
- 2012 QBN Mugs 4141
- Spammer Report Hotline 23872387
- Chick of the Day 1431514315
- Steve Jobs FBI file 88
- Shit QBNers think 7373
- edge printing 1212
- Show your latest Pics 29722972
- Logo from Locked PDF? 44
- blog 5558155581
- FMT 020312 4747
- Show Yo Dog 2012
- Politics 1759817598
Pretentious Twittery 3232 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 1 month ago | Thread started: Jan 2, 10, 10:04 a.m.
Out of context: Response #5 [Jan 2, 10, 10:04 a.m.]
- Dr_Sparkleshine
It's like saying "creativity isn't music"..which is true as far as it goes..but some of the most influential musicians know jack about music theory, or throw it out the window when doing their most innovative and powerful work.
Just cause a jazz pianist could reel off theoretically chord changes or a guitarist could run up and down scales at hyperspeeds doesn't make it "music".
I find the people that make the arguments relating the theoretical aspects of a body of knowledge to actual competence in that same area tend to be over-educated, creatively thwarted twits who are disciples of some influential figure in their lives. Except for the rare few geniuses who are both theoretically competent enough to ignore all of it in their work.


- View thread



