Public Voice Network
- Diablo III 8080
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Pic of the Day 6329263292
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- Chick of the Day 1537215372
- the gif animation thread 1282112821
- Vid of the Day 1203012030
- Euro Crisis 55
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- Coda 2 3232
- paper trail 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
Happy Birthday Marines 1010 Responses
Last post: 3 years, 6 months ago | Thread started: Nov 10, 08, 10 a.m.
Out of context: Response #8 [Nov 10, 08, 10 a.m.]
- nilsnihil
Baker: Politicians constantly fondle a small, clean, paperweight version of this war, as if it provides them with moral clarity. We know that it was the most destructive five year period in history. It was destructive of human lives, and also of shelter, sleep, warmth, gentleness, mercy, political refuge, rational discussion, legal process, civil tradition, and public truth. Millions of people were gassed, shot, starved, and worked to death by a paranoid fanatic. The war's victims felt as if they'd come to the end of civilization.
But then we also say that because it turned out so badly, it was the one just, necessary war. We acknowledge that it was the worst catastrophe in the history of humanity--and yet it was "the good war." The Greatest Generation fought it, and a generation of people was wiped out.
If we don't try to understand this one war better--understand it not in the sense of coming up with elaborate mechanistic theories of causation, but understand it in the humbler sense of feeling our way through its enormity--then cartoon versions of what happened will continue to distort debates about the merits of all future wars.

- View thread




