Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 1051210512
- speak russian? 99
- design thread 146146
- Triangle logos 4747
- QBN 3333
- unicorn logos 5555
- ooh, haai! 1616
- God is quite busy 128128
- Illustrating... 1313
- Venice Floods 44
- 1st thursday portland 44
- Friday Lunch Ruin. 66
- FMT 120508 4040
- smart hot chicks 2929
- Tom Sachs: Custom Sharpie 99
- girl help 323323
- ffffound invite swapshop 526526
- Favorite brands 6767
- font ID 44
- blog 3131331313
- Property 2626
- NY / KCDC / 12.7.09
- Least favourite brands 4646
- Seattle Tattoo 44
unbelievable 2525 Responses
Last post: 5 months, 1 week ago | Thread started: Jun 26, 08, 5:44 a.m.
Out of context: Response #2 [Jun 26, 08, 5:44 a.m.]
- detritus
I still don't quite get this - from the reports on Radio4 this morning, the sum of the plan amounts to something like "If there are two equal candidates, the employer can choose who they want".
OK, then.
But how else would they do it?
Is it just legislation to endorse free choice? I mean, it's not saying that you should actively choose the 'Less Typical' option (for wont of a better term), just that you're free to choose who you want. If that's so - how does it work now?
I mean, if it were me, I'd rather choose the woman anyway, and pocket the 40% difference in her reduced pay...


- View thread


