Public Voice Network
- I need new tunes 55
- EC: Rankin Photography 88
- Real family history for O… 11
- EC: VVork 1818
- faking history
- Obama Tag 3737
- DJ Logo Critique. 55
- hungover 11
- nice new site I found 6262
- Anybody can share me a ff… 1616
- IE 8 beta2 33
- Hanging in philly 44
- God Damn Camel Spider! 2929
- McCain's VP 188188
- FMT 082908 5757
- Nederlands 157157
- QBN Sat Night 2828
- Point5/Jawks '08 6060
- php dev companies 55
- Muxtape down? 1212
- Grass Greener On The Othe… 3737
- Pic of the Day 74837483
- you think you know ghetto… 1111
- Classic Commercials 44
Negative scanner 99 Responses
Last post: 3 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: May 12, 08, 5:07 p.m.
- rafalski
Back before the digital scanners were dang expensive. I was wondering.. would it make sense to get a 35mm film scanner now? They must be pretty cheap on ebay or who knows where now.
Do these scanners degrade with time?
What to look for? What to be careful about when buying? Which models?..- May 12, 08, 5:07 p.m. – Permalink
- organic_grid
Rafalski, I used Photofixpro based in Arizona to scan my old 35mm and medium format negatives. Thye did a great job and it was relatively inexpensive. I found that most negative scanners and the carriers never really worked well or peformed upto my expectations, even the AGFA and KODAK negative scanners are not worth the money and time.


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 5:14 p.m. – Permalink
- rafalski
I'm thinking of digitizing old family photos and all of mine, but mostly of having something to play with in future.
Just toying with the idea of shooting film some time. I never liked film photography, but knew I would someday.
I remember this baby: http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/l…


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 5:32 p.m. – Permalink
- tkmeister
Yes, i have a Nikon coolscan V ED. It's nice and does a great job scanning films and slides. I've scanned about 500 negatives since I bought it about 3wks ago(I've been thinking about buying it for 2yrs). I have about 2000 negatives to go.
I was thinking about getting done by somewhere/someone but I actually enjoy the process of doing it myself. It's almost meditating. You can scan up to 6 negative frames consecutively and most of my negatives are cut at 4frames. Like it's been said, it is time consuming and I usually do it while I am doing something else. I just have to feed new frames every 10-15min.
Let me know if you have any questions. I've done a lot of research before I finally decided to buy it.


- Dog-earMay 12, 08, 10:22 p.m. – Permalink


