Public Voice Network
- blog 2473424734
- damn notes!! 1010
- Favorite fragrance? 5757
- Art directing 2020
- flash help 77
- who wants to be a troll 2727
- Tokyo
- 090508 PSB 6464
- Orange County, CA 55
- Best place for design 1616
- WP Help 33
- QBN Mugs '08 314314
- Foreign Languages 3535
- Lindstrom
- So Cal QBNrs 11
- macbook pro magnified 44
- Hello QBN 1313
- WeArePhi 140140
- LHC 1818
- I saw my x (blog) 1717
- Conservative Slogan 1818
- EC: The Blackbird 1212
- Entourage season premiere… 1818
- Nikon D60 77
rare petition.... 1919 Responses
Last post: 3 months, 4 weeks ago | Thread started: May 10, 08, 11:54 a.m.
- ninjasavant
you shot who in the what now?


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 12:03 p.m. – Permalink
- ninjasavant
like teeth brushing?


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 12:16 p.m. – Permalink
- TheBlueOne
Like a guy wearing bermuda shorts at a formal wedding?


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 2:14 p.m. – Permalink
- Jnr_Madison


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 2:49 p.m. – Permalink
- roger84
some of your comments help me...
but the problem is that the "informal act", had to be funny/nice and no unpolite.
For example yesterday I thought the idea of one guy on casual wear and wearing a fluor hat, eating popcorn at the opera, or in a job interview, the aspirant put his feet above the desk like a boss while the real boss or interviewed look at him surprised.The problem of those two examples is that maybe these situations are a bit unpolite and are a bad example for the population....
so... what are you think? any original idea? U_u....
thanks and sorry for my english ............. remember i'm from spain, a kind of north african republic.


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 3:28 p.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
breathing


- Dog-earMay 10, 08, 4:58 p.m. – Permalink
- ribit
'Change the formality' seems an unusual use of English, I think? (Not sure I'd ever use 'formality' actually...)
Not sure if you are trying to say 'challenge' formality, or change to a new type of formality, or what exactly... Do you have more clues from the client?


- Dog-earMay 11, 08, 3:43 p.m. – Permalink




