Public Voice Network
- You need a website, darli… 1818
- Logo Crit 120120
- Macho-wsome! 11
- MadinSpain'08 | Sched… 22
- Beyonce's sister has … 2323
- God Damn Camel Spider! 2424
- Togo hon dad, Legolas! Da… 44
- Great office pranks? 1515
- Hate & Advertising 2727
- QUICKTIME VR 55
- radiohead 1818
- Nederlands 9393
- InDesign Question 88
- Vancouver 2424
- What are you listening to… 492492
- blog 2396023960
- :: How to be a DJ :: 3737
- Pic of the Day 74017401
- Album Cover Template 33
- McCain 7171
- What is this about? 1515
- QBN MOLESKINE PROJECT 196196
- Jesus is a Moth 99
- Mythbusters to Tackle Moo… 1414
Phorm vs. Phorm 77 Responses
Last post: 3 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: May 3, 08, 6:02 a.m.
Out of context: Response #4 [May 3, 08, 6:02 a.m.]
- neverblink
Do you think they're close enough to call a 'rip'? Or do you think it doesn't matter? (I'm not sure I do)
- detritusI think they are similar, no question about that.
But I've seen dozens of logo's in this style, with simple 'selfmade' lettering, and they all look alike!
This happens to be the same name, for two companies that both do computer related stuff. But they are not targeting the same audience for the same work. So I don't think either Phorm is missing out on business because of the other.I like the dark olive wordmark better because it seems to have been thought out better. The 'belly' of the 'p' is not a perfect circle, but reveals some basic knowledge of typography. The cuts on both the 'p' and 'o' are not 90degrees. Which gives it more of the 'movement' e-pill mentioned.
all in all, is this a rip? If it is, I think it's an improvement. Does it really matter and should they go to court over this? No.


- View thread


