Public Voice Network
- paper trail 66
- pdf portfolio 55
- I can see it in the pixel… 1111
- Chick of the Day 1536515365
- Pic of the Day 6328963289
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- shopped? 44
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1616
- Euro Crisis 44
- Vid of the Day 1202912029
- Dark Knight Rises 575575
- Coda 2 3131
- In Dallas for a month 99
- Video Cameras Under $2000 66
- stock music 55
- the gif animation thread 1281912819
- Diablo III 7979
- Random Fascinations? 22
- Kids Helmet Dilemma 2020
- Best podcast app for Andr…
Ripping/Copying 3737 Responses
Last post: 4 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Feb 9, 08, 9:05 a.m.
Out of context: Response #17 [Feb 9, 08, 9:05 a.m.]
- Corvo
^^ there's an interesting side to OSFA's situation. Why is it not ok for the client to own the design - and let you or another designer develop it later on, as the business takes new shapes? After all, a design is made for a particular client and it is part of his assets. But of course, everybody would hate that - dropping off of a gig and having another team working on your stuff - but (imagine) the other team is respectful of your job and tries to improve it? I think then we would be on what Anders would call a "positive rip-off?". Thing is ideas are dear and are the designer's asset, so no one evens considers with pleasure having another person profiting from your work - but that is contraditory to the aim and nature of design itself. A little bit contraditory at least.


- View thread



