Public Voice Network
- paper trail 55
- I can see it in the pixel… 88
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Pic of the Day 6328863288
- shopped? 44
- Car Design(s) 132132
- pdf portfolio 44
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1616
- Euro Crisis 44
- Vid of the Day 1202912029
- Dark Knight Rises 575575
- Chick of the Day 1536215362
- Coda 2 3131
- In Dallas for a month 99
- Video Cameras Under $2000 66
- stock music 55
- the gif animation thread 1281912819
- Diablo III 7979
- Random Fascinations? 22
- Kids Helmet Dilemma 2020
- Best podcast app for Andr…
Shepard Fairey Controversy 5454 Responses
Last post: 4 years, 5 months ago | Thread started: Nov 27, 07, 4:22 p.m.
Out of context: Response #12 [Nov 27, 07, 4:22 p.m.]
- Chief
"What initially disturbed me about the art of Shepard Fairey is that it displays none of the line, modeling and other idiosyncrasies that reveal an artist’s unique personal style. His imagery appears as though it’s xeroxed or run through some computer graphics program; that is to say, it is machine art that any second-rate art student could produce.
In fact, I’ve never seen any evidence indicating Fairey can draw at all."
pffft, what difference does that make? this sounds like some of the bs that came out of an open forum we had back in art school where the painting students and faculty refused to aknowledge the digital media program as "real art" all while paul pfeiffer sat with a bewildered look on his face like wtf am i doing here.

- View thread




