Lightroom vs Aperture 2222 Responses

Last post: 1 month, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Oct 26, 07, 9:52 a.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• MrD

  which is better?

  Oct 26, 07, 9:52 a.m. – Permalink

• Meeklo

  I think that is a question that only you can answer, based on trial use of both tools for your own specific applications.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 9:57 a.m. – Permalink

• Duckphat

  Aperture for me. Runs faster on Leopard and version 2 is going to be great.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:03 a.m. – Permalink

• MrD

  yah i will try out the trial...

  i wonder if Lightroom has closer integration with the CS

  and wonder how Aperture works with adobe products

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:05 a.m. – Permalink

• madirish

  works very well. my friend teaches the Aperature sessions aroudn the country and they use it exclusively with photoshop.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:08 a.m. – Permalink

• menos

  could this be a case of

  'same shit, different century' -ism?

  ...really don't know... i thought aperture had almost vanished all of a sudden...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:09 a.m. – Permalink

• MrD

  ...really don't know... i thought aperture had almost vanished all of a sudden...
  menos
  (Oct 26 07, 10:09)

  thats what i thought cause they laid off almost the whole dev team for it.

  and most of them went to Adobe beginning of this year

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:10 a.m. – Permalink

• danthon

  I went with lightroom so I could share catalogs between mac and PC. I reallly like it.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:13 a.m. – Permalink

• menos

  thats what i thought cause they laid off almost the whole dev team for it.

  and most of them went to Adobe beginning of this year
  MrD
  (Oct 26 07, 10:10)

  ahhhh... this could be, my friend!
  so basically the two share sme/similar technologies then?

  • No its prolly like Motion and AE, where Motion is more GPU accelerated and core image driven– modern

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:14 a.m. – Permalink

• MrD

  hmmm

  i will try it out

  but maybe adobe since its been around longer

  aperture might get canned again...

  but at both $99 still cheap

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:15 a.m. – Permalink

• madirish

  aperature is going no where, believe me...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 10:15 a.m. – Permalink

• scoops

  Just got LR and it's bad ass.. Much faster on my new intel imac than aperture trial i downloaded... shamefully faster in fact.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 1:29 p.m. – Permalink

• danthon

  lightroom is def badass.

  Although there are some interesting limitations. The biggest one that screwed me up is the 10,000 pixel size limit. I do tons of pano work and now I have to size images to 9,999 pixels in order to import them. Boooooooo

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 1:35 p.m. – Permalink

• Sickman

  Although there are some interesting limitations. The biggest one that screwed me up is the 10,000 pixel size limit. I do tons of pano work and now I have to size images to 9,999 pixels in order to import them. Boooooooo
  danthon
  (Oct 26 07, 13:35)

  same here - although i havn't tried resizing to 9999pixels

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 1:51 p.m. – Permalink

• danthon

  same here - although i havn't tried resizing to 9999pixels
  Sickman
  (Oct 26 07, 13:51)

  works like a charm ;-)

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 2:22 p.m. – Permalink

• Meeklo

  I haven't seen or used lightroom yet, but I heard that its faster than aperture.

  I do have the new aperture on an intel mac and I have to say, the fact that you can now reference files to external drives (as opposed to the first version) makes it a lot faster to browse large libraries.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 2:58 p.m. – Permalink

• ok_not_ok

  Adobe Camera RAW

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 26, 07, 6:18 p.m. – Permalink

• ninjasavant

  I've been test driving the Aperture 2 trial and the Lightroom 2 Beta for about a week now and the verdict is:

  Lightroom pwns Aperture hands down.

  • Mind sharing why? I currently use Aperture 1.5 and was thinking about upgrading but may jump to Lightroom if it's really a better tool.– nearestexit1/2

    lightroom has better interface and work flow and better quality over all in editing and managing– MrDinky2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 08, 7:59 p.m. – Permalink

• sikma

  I keep hearing this but haven't had a chance to try either. What gave Lightroom the edge?

  • currently using lightroom 1.4– sikma

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 08, 8:40 p.m. – Permalink

• ninjasavant

  ^ Ease of use, power of the tools, how easy the tools are to understand and use, smart collections, etc.

  It's a lot of little things that I'm sure Aperture might do but LR just had a wow factor with me that made it the clear winner almost at first glance.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 08, 8:51 p.m. – Permalink

• ismith

  I use Aperture 2, but I only use it for cataloging purposes. I very rarely need to edit photos since I'm so used to film, although I do occasionally adjust WB. The only time I really need to do selective coloring and such is when using it for a project at which point I'll have it in Photoshop anyway.

  • One of the things that brought me to LR was the fact that I like to rifle through a bunch of edits– ninjasavant1/5

    on multiple pics and jumping back and forth between whatever and Photoshop was kinda annoying and time intensive . . .– ninjasavant2/5

    intensive. LR helps speed up my workflow and leaves PS for the intense edits.– ninjasavant3/5

    That's my point; my only edits are the intense ones for specific projects. Otherwise, I'm fine with just having a pretty browsing interface.– ismith4/5

    interface, which to me is Aperture.– ismith5/5

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 08, 8:52 p.m. – Permalink