Public Voice Network
- I can see it in the pixel… 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Pic of the Day 6328863288
- shopped? 44
- Car Design(s) 132132
- pdf portfolio 44
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1616
- Euro Crisis 44
- Vid of the Day 1202912029
- Dark Knight Rises 575575
- Chick of the Day 1536215362
- Coda 2 3131
- In Dallas for a month 99
- Video Cameras Under $2000 66
- stock music 55
- the gif animation thread 1281912819
- Diablo III 7979
- Random Fascinations? 22
- Kids Helmet Dilemma 2020
- Best podcast app for Andr…
- Your Fav Funny Thing? 9191
Quote someone 10801080 Responses
Last post: 4 years, 6 months ago | Thread started: Feb 5, 07, 5:38 p.m.
Out of context: Response #17 [Feb 5, 07, 5:38 p.m.]
- version3
The term "learning disability" has appeal because it implies a specific neurological condition for which no one can be held particularly responsible, and yet it escapes the stigma of mental retardation. There is no implication of neglect, emotional disturbance, or improper training or education, nor does it imply a lack of motivation on the part of the child. For these cosmetic reasons, it is a rather nice term to have around.
-U. S. Government Study On The Labeling Of Children


- View thread



