Public Voice Network
- Really? 1111
- Xbox: New Generation Reve… 6060
- The Silk Road
- Freelance Billing and Tim… 3939
- Gay thread 122122
- best on Netflix streaming… 232232
- Ray Manzarek, RIP : / 1616
- Pic of the Day 7470574705
- DaftPunk 207207
- Weird iStock images 209209
- Smatik Update 2013 33
- Vid of the Day 1505215052
- E-Books: A New Art Form? 33
- Famous Street Artists 44
- Show some recent work 55535553
- San Francisco 1717
- WtF? 99
- Client of the Day 148148
- starting a design busines… 33
- Server-side Video FX 1111
- Stag Do - London
- Name this design style 3737
- WTF 22
- FMT170513 1414
Quote someone 11501150 Responses
Last post: 5 years, 5 months ago | Thread started: Feb 5, 07, 5:38 p.m.
Out of context: Response #17 [Feb 5, 07, 5:38 p.m.]
- version3
The term "learning disability" has appeal because it implies a specific neurological condition for which no one can be held particularly responsible, and yet it escapes the stigma of mental retardation. There is no implication of neglect, emotional disturbance, or improper training or education, nor does it imply a lack of motivation on the part of the child. For these cosmetic reasons, it is a rather nice term to have around.
-U. S. Government Study On The Labeling Of Children


- View thread



